<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acer Announces Acer Liquid e</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e</link>
	<description>Acer Liquid Google Android Phone Information, Acer Liquid Reviews,Acer Liquid News,Acer Liquid Pictures,Acer Liquid Video,and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 08:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Should this mean that Acer is not willing to provide an upgrade for Liquid A1 to the Eclair 2.0/2.1 in the near future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should this mean that Acer is not willing to provide an upgrade for Liquid A1 to the Eclair 2.0/2.1 in the near future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liquid_owner</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>liquid_owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 19:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-513</guid>
		<description>2.1 ROM has been leaked already, do a search for it. Been running it on my A1 for a couple of weeks and it&#039;s pretty stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.1 ROM has been leaked already, do a search for it. Been running it on my A1 for a couple of weeks and it&#8217;s pretty stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Official confirmation for end of April in Europe see (in French) &lt;a href=&quot;http://bliquid.fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bliquid.fr&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Official confirmation for end of April in Europe see (in French) <a href="http://bliquid.fr" rel="nofollow">http://bliquid.fr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-446</guid>
		<description>when the android 2.1 on the acer liquid A1???????
we want it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when the android 2.1 on the acer liquid A1???????<br />
we want it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Official confirmation for end of April in Europe see (in French) &lt;a href=&quot;http://bliquid.fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bliquid.fr&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Official confirmation for end of April in Europe see (in French) <a href="http://bliquid.fr" rel="nofollow">http://bliquid.fr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 10:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-331</guid>
		<description>when the android 2.1 on the acer liquid A1???????
we want it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when the android 2.1 on the acer liquid A1???????<br />
we want it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Why dont they provide upgrade to existing customer. We early adopters are the one who made acer famous in this area. Are they forgetting us

Any information on upgrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dont they provide upgrade to existing customer. We early adopters are the one who made acer famous in this area. Are they forgetting us</p>
<p>Any information on upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radu</title>
		<link>http://www.acerliquid.net/acer-announces-acer-liquid-e/comment-page-1#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Radu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acerliquid.net/?p=45#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Should this mean that Acer is not willing to provide an upgrade for Liquid A1 to the Eclair 2.0/2.1 in the near future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should this mean that Acer is not willing to provide an upgrade for Liquid A1 to the Eclair 2.0/2.1 in the near future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->